<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Partisan Gridlock &#187; 2008 Election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nachonblog.com/category/2008-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nachonblog.com</link>
	<description>Geoff Berg is a &#34;lying sack of manure.&#34; -- Joseph Farah, WorldNetDaily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:05:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sassy Dame Doesn&#8217;t Realize They Want to be Called &#8220;Negroes&#8221; Nowadays</title>
		<link>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/sassy-dame-doesnt-realize-they-want-to-be-called-negroes-nowadays/</link>
		<comments>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/sassy-dame-doesnt-realize-they-want-to-be-called-negroes-nowadays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Lohan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nachonblog.com/?p=2356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dateline Los Angeles: Glamorous Hollywood starlet Lindsay Lohan caused controversy today when she referred to Barack Obama as &#8220;our first colored president&#8221; in an interview with Access Hollywood (which is only available on something called &#8220;television&#8221;)!  Apparently, nobody&#8217;s told the dreamy actress that dark-skinned leaders have recently made it known that they should be called [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Dateline Los Angeles: Glamorous Hollywood starlet Lindsay Lohan caused controversy today when <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2008/11/11/lindsay-lohan-hooray-for-the-coloreds/">she referred to Barack Obama as &#8220;our first colored president&#8221;</a> in an interview with Access Hollywood (which is only available on something called &#8220;television&#8221;)!  Apparently, nobody&#8217;s told the dreamy actress that dark-skinned leaders have recently made it known that they should be called &#8220;Negroes&#8221; instead of &#8220;colored&#8221; (even though the Lord God almighty obviously colored them). Here&#8217;s the newsreel:</p>
<p><center><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://widgets.accesshollywood.com/o/482a0d55893fbe3f/4919ced21250e2d6/4919ae387a6424d7/77acccb8/-cpid/37395d597e420dc9" id="W482a0d55893fbe3f4919ced21250e2d6" width="400" height="400"><param name="movie" value="http://widgets.accesshollywood.com/o/482a0d55893fbe3f/4919ced21250e2d6/4919ae387a6424d7/77acccb8/-cpid/37395d597e420dc9" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="all" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/sassy-dame-doesnt-realize-they-want-to-be-called-negroes-nowadays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are We&#8230;.President-Elect?</title>
		<link>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/are-wethe-president-elect/</link>
		<comments>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/are-wethe-president-elect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blazing Saddles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nachonblog.com/?p=2352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama went to the White House to talk with President Bush today. The historic meeting: [youtube QmgAOOQBVCU] MSNBC&#8217;s less interesting coverage:  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama went to the White House to talk with President Bush today. The historic meeting:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">[youtube QmgAOOQBVCU]</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">MSNBC&#8217;s less interesting coverage:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p><center><iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/27647520#27647520" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/are-wethe-president-elect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Obama Need Not Count Beans</title>
		<link>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/why-obama-need-not-count-beans/</link>
		<comments>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/why-obama-need-not-count-beans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 16:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affirmative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Cabinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nachonblog.com/?p=2346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In December 1992, as Bill Clinton was assembling his cabinet, he took a moment to respond to feminist complaints about a supposed lack of high-level female appointments: In an unusually candid discussion yesterday, Clinton said he was particularly unhappy that two of his appointees &#8211; Laura D&#8217;Andrea Tyson as chairwoman of the Council of Economic Advisors and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">In December 1992, as Bill Clinton was assembling his cabinet, he <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/archives/1992/9212220021.asp">took a moment to respond</a> to feminist complaints about a supposed lack of high-level female appointments:</p>
<blockquote style="text-align: justify;"><p>In an unusually candid discussion yesterday, Clinton said he was particularly unhappy that two of his appointees &#8211; Laura D&#8217;Andrea Tyson as chairwoman of the Council of Economic Advisors and Carol Browner as administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency &#8211; were being treated by some women&#8217;s advocates as less important than other appointees because their jobs are not Cabinet level.</p>
<p>&#8220;I believe that if I had appointed white men to those jobs, those people, those same people would have been counting those jobs in a very negative way,&#8221; he said. &#8220;They would have been counting those positions against our administration, those bean counters who are doing that, if I had appointed white men to those positions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Gesturing toward O&#8217;Leary, who is black, he said that no women&#8217;s group or black group had included her name as a recommended Cabinet choice. O&#8217;Leary would be the third black appointment Clinton has made.</p>
<p>&#8220;They are playing quota games and math games,&#8221; Clinton said at the news conference, noting that he had interviewed only women for EPA administrator and for the head of his economic advisers.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Today, the Houston Chronicle (my hometown paper), <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/outlook/6101540.html">urges Barack Obama</a> to focus on both merit and diversity in making his appointments:</p>
<blockquote style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">President-elect Barack Obama enjoys two strengths as he faces the formidable task of choosing a Cabinet. First is the breadth and diversity of his support: blue-collar Anglos, Latinos, Jews, African-Americans, white youth and an important share of independents and Republicans. Second is his world view: Democratic, to be sure, but autonomous enough to tap the best minds for ideas.</p>
<p>His Cabinet selections should reflect these strengths, drawing from the ethnic and ideological coalition that spurred his victory, while rejecting any tokenism. Hiring a Republican or other minority, only to ignore them, would undermine Obama&#8217;s credibility as a president who seizes the best ideas whatever their source.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Here&#8217;s another suggestion: focus entirely on merit. This is a nation of 300 million people. Sure qualified supporters (who come from diverse backgrounds) ought to be considered for undersecretary and deputy positions, but in case it escaped notice, Barack Obama will be the nation&#8217;s first black president.  Of all the pressures he feels (and should rightly feel) in assembling his government, creating a &#8220;diverse&#8221; cabinet should be among the least important.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Discrimination still exists, but whoever serves in the Obama Administration will answer to a black man. We&#8217;ve got all the symbolism we need. Obama&#8217;s cabinet could look like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=171FURqSIQc">Bushwood Country Club&#8217;s</a> membership committee, the <a href="http://morefire.files.wordpress.com/2006/10/37024583waitingforthebrooklynferry.jpg">Hollywood Producers Guild</a>, a casting call for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moesha">Moesha</a> or <a href="http://www.stanford.edu/group/lambdas/gallery/Socials/2.jpg">Stanford University&#8217;s math club</a> and it just wouldn&#8217;t matter. After eight years of near total failure in government, competence is what counts &#8212; now more than ever.  Bean counters and boot-licking yes men (<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFBOQzSk14c">and women</a>) ought to butt out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/why-obama-need-not-count-beans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perplexed Conservatives Happy to Report They Were Right All Along: Islamic World Celebrates / Condemns Obama&#8217;s Election</title>
		<link>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/perplexed-conservatives-happy-to-report-they-were-right-all-along-islamic-world-celebrates-condemns-obamas-election/</link>
		<comments>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/perplexed-conservatives-happy-to-report-they-were-right-all-along-islamic-world-celebrates-condemns-obamas-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamic World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Little Green Footballs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nachonblog.com/?p=2344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unlike a lot of Democrats, I like Little Green Footballs.  Charles Johnson is a terrific writer and is simply not wrong about the existence of serious and ongoing threats from the Arab and Islamic world toward the US, Israel, Europe, and others. But come on &#8212; settle on a message already. On the one hand, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Unlike a lot of Democrats, I like <a href="http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php">Little Green Footballs</a>.  Charles Johnson is a terrific writer and is simply not wrong about the existence of serious and ongoing threats from the Arab and Islamic world toward the US, Israel, Europe, and others.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But come on &#8212; settle on a message already. On the one hand, Islamist freaks are euphoric that Barack Obama (their most successful sleeper agent), won the election and will no doubt soon begin imposing  <em>Sharia</em> law on the US.  On the other, rational Republicans were right all along: Obama is in for a rude awakening from the Islamic World, which hates <em>all</em> Americans, even naive liberals like him.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Republican disconnect number one takes place at 11:03 am Wednesday on LGF, where Islamist freaks were jumping for joy at Obama&#8217;s win:</p>
<div id="ent31821" style="text-align: justify;">
<blockquote>
<h2><a rel="31821" href="http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/31821_Muslim_Brotherhood_Smiling">Muslim Brotherhood Smiling</a></h2>
<p class="timedate"><span>World</span> | Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:03:44 am  PST</p>
<p>The leader of the world&rsquo;s largest jihadist organization, the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, is a happy man today: <a title="World leaders&rsquo; quotes on Obama election win | U.S. | Reuters" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE4A42U620081105?sp=true" target="_blank">World leaders&rsquo; quotes on Obama election win</a>.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">MOHAMED MAHDI AKEF, LEADER OF THE EGYPTIAN MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, ONE OF THE LARGEST ISLAMIST GROUPS IN THE MIDDLE EAST</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&ldquo;We congratulate (Obama) on the confidence of the American people in him and we hope that he will change the policy of the United States toward the Middle East and toward the crimes which are happening in Afghanistan and Somalia, in other words that he adopts a just policy that restores to America its natural position of respect for humankind and democracy.&rdquo;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Number two happens just an hour and two minutes later, when LGF sensed a change of heart coming from the Middle East:</p>
<div id="ent31823">
<blockquote>
<h2><a rel="31823" href="http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/31823_Arab_Reactions_to_Obamas_Election">Arab Reactions to Obama&#8217;s Election</a></h2>
<p class="timedate"><span>World</span> | Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:05:04 pm  PST</p>
<p>MEMRI has <a title="MEMRI: Latest News" href="http://www.memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=SD210308" target="_blank">reactions from Arab media</a> to the election of Barack Obama. Includes this lovely sentiment from our good friends in Saudi Arabia:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The Saudi daily Al-Watan stated in an editorial: &#8220;There is no significant difference between Obama and McCain. They disagree only on the means to achieve America&rsquo;s chief goal, which is to rule for another hundred years.&#8221;</p>
<p>And here&rsquo;s a wake up call for anyone who believes Obama&rsquo;s election is going to increase the love from Islamists:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">In a fatwa published on the eve of the U.S. elections, Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi expressed his preference for Sen. John McCain as president: &ldquo;Personally, I would prefer for the Republican candidate, [John] McCain, to be elected. This is because I prefer the obvious enemy who does not hypocritically [conceal] his hostility toward you&#8230; to the enemy who wears a mask [of friendliness].&rdquo;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Al-Qaradhawi added: &ldquo;Whoever thinks that the Democrats are less hostile to [the Arabs] than the Republicans should know that the number of Iraqis killed during the siege [of Iraq] by the Democrat Bill Clinton is twice as high as the number of [Iraqis] killed by the Republican [George] Bush.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&ldquo;The Democrats kill you slowly without you noticing it &#8211; and therein lies the danger. They are like a snake whose touch is not felt until its poison enters your body.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&ldquo;Therefore, I hope that McCain comes to power, so that the motivation for jihad remains in our hearts, and so that we do not [begin to] rely on the infidels &#8211; [which will cause us] to be struck by the fire [of Hell].&rdquo;</p>
<p>Hope! Change!</p></blockquote>
<p>Make! Up! Your! Mind!</p></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/perplexed-conservatives-happy-to-report-they-were-right-all-along-islamic-world-celebrates-condemns-obamas-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election Night in Ten Minutes</title>
		<link>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/election-night-in-ten-minutes/</link>
		<comments>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/election-night-in-ten-minutes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election Night]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nachonblog.com/?p=2341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jed Lewison put together this extraordinary video of election night, from state-by-state projections to parts of Obama&#8217;s victory speech.  I didn&#8217;t watch any of Fox News&#8217; coverage, so it&#8217;s remarkable to see just how depressed their reporters and anchors were as the evening wore on. Does anyone actually believe that Fox is a straight news outfit? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Jed Lewison put together <a href="http://www.jedreport.com/2008/11/a-night-to-remember-barack-oba.html">this extraordinary video</a> of election night, from state-by-state projections to parts of Obama&#8217;s victory speech.  I didn&#8217;t watch any of Fox News&#8217; coverage, so it&#8217;s remarkable to see just how depressed their reporters and anchors were as the evening wore on. Does anyone actually believe that Fox is a straight news outfit? (Other than Palin supporters, of course.)</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">[youtube 6qiRwCuQmZA] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/election-night-in-ten-minutes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just in Time for Election Day: Predictions</title>
		<link>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/just-in-time-for-election-day-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/just-in-time-for-election-day-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electoral Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nachonblog.com/?p=2334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a little late for electoral predictions, sure.  I was too superstitious to post this before the election.  On October 30th, just like we do every four years, my brother and I bet on the outcome of the presidential election.  The competition is for most states correctly called, not closest to the actual electoral result.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">It&#8217;s a little late for electoral predictions, sure.  I was too superstitious to post this before the election. </p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">On October 30th, just like we do every four years, my brother and I bet on the outcome of the presidential election.  The competition is for most states correctly called, not closest to the actual electoral result. </p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This year the bet was was $100.  Because he&#8217;s kind of a spiteful dude and an extremely sore loser, he told me at the time that if I won, he was going to pay me in nickels.  He&#8217;s also kind of a degenerate gambler, so it may be his way of saying he needs to get to Atlantic City. </p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In any event, I kicked his ass and remain undefeated. Here&#8217;s his map:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://nachonblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/gab2.bmp"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2335" title="gab2" src="http://nachonblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/gab2.bmp" alt="" width="645" height="405" /></a></p>
<p>Mine:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://nachonblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/gab1.bmp"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2336" title="gab1" src="http://nachonblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/gab1.bmp" alt="" width="639" height="412" /></a></p>
<p>And the actual result:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://nachonblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/actual.bmp"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2337" title="actual" src="http://nachonblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/actual.bmp" alt="" width="654" height="469" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">My disrespectful younger brother (who lives in New York while Janice and I remain in Texas) responds:</p>
<blockquote style="text-align: justify;"><p>I hope Obama shows more restraint than you &#8212; you dare gloat and you won by 2 states. Indiana, Florida and North Carolina went blue. I had Missouri staying red. Or, to put it another way, you had more faith in your fellow rednecks.</p>
<p>I do owe you 2000 nickels.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;"> Very, very hateful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/just-in-time-for-election-day-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Every Day is Hanukkah</title>
		<link>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/every-day-is-hanukkah/</link>
		<comments>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/every-day-is-hanukkah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Implosion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Recriminations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nachonblog.com/?p=2332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When a judge looks at an opposing lawyer and goes to town on him, it&#8217;s best to remain silent.  Any lawyer who has ever been in a courtroom has been on both sides of that kind of thing. It&#8217;s no fun when it happens to you, but golly it&#8217;s satisfying to watch it happen to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">When a judge looks at an opposing lawyer and goes to town on him, it&#8217;s best to remain silent.  Any lawyer who has ever been in a courtroom has been on both sides of that kind of thing. It&#8217;s no fun when it happens to you, but golly it&#8217;s satisfying to watch it happen to someone else.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">That&#8217;s kind of what&#8217;s going on with Republicans these days.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Via <a href="http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=22739">Hot Air</a>: <a href="http://frum.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTA3MDY2NGE3ODFjYjViNjhlOGFkMWZiNzYwZWRmYjY=">David Frum</a> says Nicole Wallace is the source of negative leaks about Sarah Palin. He essentially says that she&#8217;s a vicious bitch, but he&#8217;s got a better vocabulary than I do.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">And speaking of negative leaks about Sarah Palin, the latest is that she didn&#8217;t know that Africa was a continent, not a country:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">[youtube tFJ-bJTIx-0]</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Also, Palin may have squeezed the RNC <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/167581/page/1">for more than $150,000</a> in new clothes &#8212; and they weren&#8217;t all for her:</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">NEWSWEEK has also learned that Palin&#8217;s shopping spree at high-end department stores was more extensive than previously reported. While publicly supporting Palin, McCain&#8217;s top advisers privately fumed at what they regarded as her outrageous profligacy. One senior aide said that Nicolle Wallace had told Palin to buy three suits for the convention and hire a stylist. But instead, the vice presidential nominee began buying for herself and her family-clothes and accessories from top stores such as Saks Fifth Avenue and Neiman Marcus. According to two knowledgeable sources, a vast majority of the clothes were bought by a wealthy donor, who was shocked when he got the bill. Palin also used low-level staffers to buy some of the clothes on their credit cards. The McCain campaign found out last week when the aides sought reimbursement. One aide estimated that she spent &#8220;tens of thousands&#8221; more than the reported $150,000, and that $20,000 to $40,000 went to buy clothes for her husband. Some articles of clothing have apparently been lost. An angry aide characterized the shopping spree as &#8220;Wasilla hillbillies looting Neiman Marcus from coast to coast,&#8221; and said the truth will eventually come out when the Republican Party audits its books.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In other GOP implosion news, <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/06/leadership-questions-in-the-gop/">House Republicans say</a> that the problem in the last couple of cycles is that their party wasn&#8217;t conservative enough.  That&#8217;s right, double down on Bush conservatism. See you in 2010.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Update</strong>:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Keith Olbermann sums it up:</p>
<p><center><iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/27583255#27583255" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/every-day-is-hanukkah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Historic Votes</title>
		<link>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/two-historic-votes/</link>
		<comments>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/two-historic-votes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nelson Mandela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nachonblog.com/?p=2327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning, I spoke to a (white) friend who immigrated to the US from South Africa.  He tells me that he&#8217;s having trouble deciding which meant more to him, his vote for Barack Obama or the one he cast  in 1994 for Nelson Mandela.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">This morning, I spoke to a (white) friend who immigrated to the US from South Africa.  He tells me that he&#8217;s having trouble deciding which meant more to him, his vote for Barack Obama or the one he cast  in 1994 for Nelson Mandela.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/two-historic-votes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>History</title>
		<link>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/history/</link>
		<comments>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 04:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guess Who's Coming to Dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nachonblog.com/?p=2325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been more or less speechless all night.  A couple of weeks ago, Janice suggested I load up this clip for election night, so I did.  Frank Rich beat me to the punch in a column last week, but it&#8217;s still incredibly moving to watch this tonight: [youtube 0LLuFpAwDQI]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">I&#8217;ve been more or less speechless all night.  A couple of weeks ago, Janice suggested I load up this clip for election night, so I did.  Frank Rich beat me to the punch in a column last week, but it&#8217;s still incredibly moving to watch this tonight:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">[youtube 0LLuFpAwDQI]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Election Day Goodness</title>
		<link>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/new-york-election-day-goodness/</link>
		<comments>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/new-york-election-day-goodness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nachonblog.com/?p=2320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From my brother in Brooklyn:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my brother in Brooklyn:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://nachonblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/img00148.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2321  aligncenter" title="img00148" src="http://nachonblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/img00148.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="400" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nachonblog.com/2008/11/new-york-election-day-goodness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

